| ▲ | awllau 2 days ago | |||||||
Casado says he was misquoted and walked this back: https://x.com/martin_casado/status/1990462245541982546 "Well, not quite. I'd say 20-30% use open source. Of those I'd say 80% use Chinese based models. So closer to 16-24%." Reads pretty differently. | ||||||||
| ▲ | kbar13 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
yeah and the gap between "use open source" and "use open source as their primary model" is probably p large | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | JamesBarney 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
This should really be the #1 comment on this post. | ||||||||
| ▲ | apparent 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Wow, that kind of undermines the entire premise of the piece. It also makes much more sense. Thanks for digging that up! | ||||||||
| ▲ | JimsonYang 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Misquote? Or selective hearing for the story headline? Thats literally a 4x difference there | ||||||||