Both are real issues, to be clear. LEO satellites are a real and increasing issue.

Yes, but one is a vastly smaller issue than the status quo issues.

Starlink gets a lot of attention because it's new, and because it's run by a polarizing guy who sucks.

Meanwhile, the airplane and streetlight situation has been destroying night sky photography for decades, to the point where photographers consult charts and have communities tracking the best times of years to minimize the hours of driving you have to do.

But let's "both are real issues" it, sure.

▲

culi 18 hours ago | parent [-]

It's an exponentially growing issue. Starlink's current fleet of ~10k is expected to grow to at least 42k. And since its been used for military uses, China and Russia have realized they also need their own competition. China's SpaceSail plans on launching 15k satellites by 2030. The EU's ambitions are much smaller than both of them, but if every developing nation continues to build their own platform, where does it end?

	▲	parl_match 17 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> where does it end It still won't be as big of an issue for night sky photography, for reasons mentioned in the parent comment. However, there are many other severe issues, of course. But for hobbyist and professional photography? Mitigable. I can see a problem with 100x the current deployment, but the "other severe issues" kick in long before that, anyways.