NixOS is more complicated than you think but OpenCode fixed it

kesor 41 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

How is this low-effort zero-value non-article even on the first page of HN in the first place?

	▲	SOLAR_FIELDS 12 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Agree but I think it’s interesting to discuss the larger implication here. Nix the language and ecosystem has historically been completely unapproachable for people unwilling to beat their head against the wall continuously to figure it out. It is famously unapproachable. Now, the benefits are accessible to the quasi-layman. Good news all around

▲

linsomniac 12 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I've had a similar experience with NixOS configured by Claude Code, and it's been really nice. I have the same config on 3 machines, all managed in one git repo, including home manager and sops, and one of the machines I skin as a "thin client" removing most of my development tools and just using it to SSH/wezterm in to my main dev box, on a small and light ex-chromebook.

▲

aidenn0 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'm not sure how much of this is complicated because of NixOS; going this far off the beaten path would be rather complicated in any distro.

I'd be a lot more sure if the author had posted their nixos configuration somewhere...

▲

tim-projects 36 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

> Ultra lightweight

Doesn't nixos use a lot more diskspace than arch, because of its store?

	▲	linsomniac 16 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		It seems like the "lightweight" they seem to be concerned with is RAM, not disc. I can't really comment on disc space usage on my own NixOS system, though my "thin client" skin does fit nicely on an old Chromebook, I think that guy has 32GB of storage.