> Yeah it's a trick question, the human error rate for it was about 30% (higher depending on the country).

Error rate doesn't prove anything. The nature of the errors is what matters.

To err is human, it also seems that to err is AI.

	▲	interstice 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		Seems like we need to update that other saying - to err is human but to really f** things up you need an AI