kimi has been particularly shameless in copying codex 1:1, wow.

Like, I get it, before condex there was conductor and a ton of other guis but this looks like they just copied the code.

Also, their privacy disclosure is incredibly misleading:

> How does Kimi Work protect my privacy when accessing local files? You have absolute control over your files. The built-in Ask before acting safeguard means Kimi will prompt you for explicit authorization before it modifies, overwrites, or runs code within your local directories. Nothing happens without your consent.

They fail to mention that is has unfettered read access to your files. ie, without your consent.

>They fail to mention that is has unfettered read access to your files.

Isn't that totally expected of a coding agent? Otherwise it's like complaining dropbox "has unfettered access to your files".

Everyone’s saying that it looks like Codex but TBH it just looks like all the AI chat websites on the side and some frequent actions on the top.

You have almost no control with Codex or Claude in that you have to trust them not to break their own rules.

You have almost no control with Kimi either, they can also say one thing and do another. You will not be able to sue a Chinese company if it breaks the law.

I can think of no faster way to hand over your trade secrets or intellectual property than to run something like this.

I think success and dominance for agent providers will eventually come to which ever is able to best guarantee that they don't damage their customers businesses not the cheapest to run.

They all are pretty similar. And if it was copying anything, I would say more inspiration from claude desktop then codex. The Zcode is more like codex.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JFfgfMO0nO7HR0WHwEqEEjXIIQj...

Do we still fall for the China = must be spying, US = wouldn't spy unless it's disclosed?

It's fair to say whatever software you run from any country of origin is hoovering up as much data about you that it can get away with.

If you haven't compiled open source, audited code and are running on that, all bets are already off.

Sharing among AI friends what’s the problem, scraping the Internet or hiring new employees between companies who like to share? It’s a tradition among the AI model makers…

>kimi has been particularly shameless in copying codex 1:1, wow.

Isn´t codex (edited) Apache 2.0 (thanks @Shank)

https://github.com/openai/codex ?

> kimi has been particularly shameless in copying codex 1:1, wow.

OpenAI's pigeons come home to roost

> kimi has been particularly shameless in copying codex 1:1, wow.

so ????

LLMs by definition are copyright infringers. so this is nothing compared to that.

I am more concerned about what happens to the file if I give permission.

Opensource and local are seeming like the only way.

if your model ever touches bash, it has unfettered acess to all your files.

How dare they copy the largest plagiarism machine ever created.

The Dutch have a saying: it's better to have stolen something well than to have invented something bad.

[flagged]