| ▲ | theodorewiles a day ago | |
Other thoughts: - I think the other mistake I see here is trying to over-engineer a deterministic learner path instead of giving the AI more free reign on best next interaction and a set of goals it needs to accomplish through the session; it can feel more responsive and free-form that way from the learner's POV. - If you had voice here you could also make the screen optional. In my experience typing out long answers to questions can take a while too - so a voice mode might be helpful for learners. It would also be cool if people could take a 'photo of their work' for e.g. math equations done by hand. - To the earlier point on family end-market, an interesting idea is modeling bloomy - have some grown-up oriented courses so you can learn with / side-by-side with your child? Just an idea. | ||
| ▲ | alexsouthmayd a day ago | parent [-] | |
Funny you say that. We actually just released a voice mode that allows students to engage, interrupt, and even switch languages. I'd love to design this to a greater extent throughout the experience so Bloomy becomes voice-first (where applicable). | ||