Bun isn't Bun, it's a (notionally) trillion dollar AI company famous for ruthlessness and engineering controversy for marketing purposes. Zig just happens to be a language led by someone with an AI-skeptic philosophy. Are you saying I should just believe that their strategically deniable negative insinuations about Zig are not bad faith?

Sorry, but I'm calling bullshit. I know there's no absolute smoking gun here, but it's all a bit too cute to be unintentional. They are very very smart people. They knew what they were doing.

▲

NewsaHackO 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

>I know there's no absolute smoking gun here

Wow, so you can't even find circumferential evidence of circumferential evidence? I guess you can believe whatever you want, evidence be damned

▲

foldr 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The simplest explanation is that the Bun team decided to try rewriting Bun in Rust because they had some frustrations with Zig. I haven't seen any evidence that there's more to it than that. It's easy to get sucked into all the internet drama, but that only exists because Zig's author lost his cool and wrote a salty blog post, not because of any conniving on Athropic's part.

▲

simondotau 6 hours ago | parent [-]

I agree that that's the surface-level, superficial, zero-thinking description of what happened.

	▲	foldr 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		You're right that I haven't spent much time thinking about why a project that I'm not involved with, and that is of only moderate general importance, has decided to switch from one programming language to another. Anyone who's convinced themselves that this is all part of some elaborate scheme is almost certainly overthinking it.