| ▲ | Xalutiono a day ago | ||||||||||||||||
Robots will take jobs from massive amount of low income people. AI will take jobs from a massive amount of avg and high income people. The disruption ahead is getting pillowed right now due to physical limitations of progress like amount of energy, building DC, doing research, training models (its still takes 1-3 month). Also a massive buffer will be the boomer going into retirement. Depending on the speed of all of this, we might get a lot poorer before we get abundance everyerwer | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | dnemmers a day ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Yep, this is a good read and feels like the correct take. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | red-iron-pine 20 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> Depending on the speed of all of this, we might get a lot poorer before we get abundance everyerwer not "might", will and it's a hell of a leap to assume massive abundance will follow -- for someone, perhaps, but not the average person | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | echelon 17 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
You have no evidence of this. Also: you can literally make incredible software that would take half a year right now for $200/month. Or free if you run local open weights. You can do branding, marketing, design. You can create comics and movies and video games. You can make an AI tool right now and get customers today. You have no idea how wildly popular this segment is. How much people willingly engage with this stuff and want it. Yet you choose to disengage and complain about a future that hasn't happened. It's more likely that firms will need to hire more to stay competitive. Or that workers will fire their old jobs and break out on their own. Something I used to think was impossible: competing with Google, Apple, Stripe. Not anymore. I think you can compete with anyone. | |||||||||||||||||