| ▲ | kfse 18 hours ago | |||||||||||||
My guess: 1) New cars are too cheap to make at scale. 2) Old cars are quite unsafe to drive, comparatively (airbags, backup cameras, lane departure alerts, blind angle alerts, etc) | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | jimnotgym 18 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
2) cars have had airbags for a pretty long time. Backup cameras are a simple retrofit. Lane departure alerts are not universally loved, mine is turned off... | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | noir_lord 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Aerodynamics as well, new cars and especially ev/hybrids are slippery compared to many/the average if we take old cars to mean 50’s through 70’s. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | psd1 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Cameras are a mitigation for high waistlines, and only a partial one. Keep your cameras and alerts, and give me a car with better fields of vision. I think there are important dimensions of safety that go unmeasured. You have much less road awareness in new cars. Survivability is great and all, but not at the expense of children and pets becoming invisible. All the focus on survivability provided another incentive for makers to put ever larger pieces of steel on the road. I disagree that new cars are safer. I have experienced driver aids glitching, and i want none of it. Anything that can take control of the car needs to be bulletproof, and it isn't. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | cansofgrease 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
The big one is probably cost and scaling. | ||||||||||||||