| ▲ | CodeCompost a day ago |
| I like the idea of not crediting the person who posted the bug but to the LLM that found it. People who find exploits using LLMs should never get a reward or credit. |
|
| ▲ | pelagicAustral a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| So people coding with LLMs shouldn't get paid then, right? |
| |
| ▲ | grey-area a day ago | parent | next [-] | | That is in fact the end goal of CEOs pushing LLM use yes. Not possible right now, but if it were they would absolutely take that option. | | |
| ▲ | jorisw a day ago | parent [-] | | [citation needed] | | |
| ▲ | bspammer a day ago | parent | next [-] | | Does "companies will cut unnecessary costs" need a citation? | |
| ▲ | muldvarp a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | Do you think the CEO of your company hired you and pays a lot of money for you because they like you? |
|
| |
| ▲ | muldvarp a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Do you assume that five years from now you'll get paid for coding with LLMs? | |
| ▲ | bakugo a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Correct. | |
| ▲ | chrisjj a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | They should get paid by the LMM only. |
|
|
| ▲ | Levitz a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It baffles me how this can be said without concern for first order consequences. |
|
| ▲ | nubg a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I agree! We should go all the way though and credit the authors of the data the LLM was trained on. People who just run LLMs training scripts should never get a reward or credit. |
| |
| ▲ | defmacr0 a day ago | parent [-] | | I take credit given all my infosec-related reddit posts they used for training. |
|
