Hmm, I believe there're many open-source self-hostable office solutions.

And they don't share a universal format.

AnthonyMouse a day ago | parent | next [-]

When the original application is open source, its format is public and anyone who wants to create a converter to another format can either use the original code or inspect it to see how the format works.

When the format is proprietary, you get a blob of binary data that you have to reverse engineer through guesswork, made orders of magnitude more difficult if the original service isn't even available anymore.

▲

est a day ago | parent [-]

The problem reminds me of pdf, the format is well known, there are tons of third-party readers, but they all glitch somewhat differently.

Also PDF is turing complete.

Modern rich content formats are hard. Open formats solves only small part of the problem.

I think the universal interchangable format is static HTML.

	▲	AnthonyMouse a day ago \| parent [-]
		PDF is a mess because it's an ancient originally-proprietary format based on a proprietary language and the Adobe "standard" didn't actually specify a lot of important things for a long time, leaving other implementations to try to reverse engineer them. Meanwhile you look at actual standard formats like PNG or UTF-8 or, as you say, HTML, and the implementations generally do a lot better because there is a proper spec.

▲

preisschild a day ago | parent | prev [-]

The Collabora Online Suite for example just uses the OpenDocument formats