In my experience, lean will show that it's correct, but does it not lose the mathematical intuition that led to the result? As far as my experience goes, that's really hard to encode in lean itself.

Could we maybe get more information about the problem from the LLM trace itself here?

▲

olmo23 a day ago | parent [-]

As proofs become more and more complex, we will need two AI pipelines: one to generate the LEAN proof, and a second one to extract useful lessons for mathematicians from the LEAN proof.

▲

auggierose a day ago | parent [-]

Or we just don't use LEAN but something better.

▲

rowanG077 a day ago | parent [-]

Does anything truly better exist? I'm not a mathematician but I did use Rocq and Lean during university. And I found lean to be better.

	▲	auggierose a day ago \| parent \| next [-]
		No, something truly better does not exist yet, but that doesn't mean that it won't. Lean is young compared to Isabelle or Rocq, but actually quite old in absolut terms (and especially in AI terms).
	▲	baq 21 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		pay attention to this one https://higherorderco.com/ and wait for bend2 announcements