How is that not like claiming that a "combination of iterative prompts and evaluation with Wolfram Alpha" would produce my Google Mail password? I also have to note that this response abandons the original claim, that the counterexample was found by exhaustively searching prior failed attempts.

▲

TOMDM a day ago | parent | next [-]

I've seen a lot of people claiming that these recent examples are just trivial combinations of existing prior work.

I'm yet to see anyone cite the prior work. If it's true I think some credit is due for the authors Fable/Sol are branching from.

▲

snarkconjecture 15 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It's absolutely not a trivial combination of prior work, or mathematicians would've found it already. This was not an obscure conjecture.

▲

tanderson92 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

https://xcancel.com/nihilunbounded/status/207910986973986045...

	▲	TOMDM 11 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts.

▲

QuesnayJr a day ago | parent | prev [-]

I haven't seen these claims, but all of the open problems that have been solved so far have been in the category of "humans could have solved them, but didn't". This doesn't diminish the significance of the results, but it does mean there's still work for mathematicians to do other than glorified prompt engineers.

This specific counterexample really is trivial. There's nothing to cite. People have wasted hours and hours on a question whose answer you could give as a homework problem in Calc II.

	▲	snarkconjecture 15 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Checking the counterexample is a Calc II problem. Finding it was beyond the efforts of the best algebraic geometers for almost a century.

▲

jvanderbot a day ago | parent | prev [-]

I can write a program right now that will print your password. It will just take a while.