| ▲ | MrDrMcCoy 2 days ago |
| As someone that does, I disagree. Laws on this subject should exclusively apply to providers, with exceptions for medical necessity. There are too many harms that come from targeting individuals to be worthwhile. |
|
| ▲ | tadfisher 2 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| Problem with that is that gathering evidence invariably leads to tracking down the recipient of the provider's service. |
| |
|
| ▲ | gershy a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Some would argue there are too many harms that occur if antiabortion measures aren't taken :( |
| |
| ▲ | TripolitianFish a day ago | parent [-] | | Either argue the point or stop talking. This is a very hard position to take seriously, twee frowny face and all, if you’re willing to sell down the river the privacy of a largely vulnerable population because some sanctimonious humanism. :( | | |
| ▲ | gershy a day ago | parent | next [-] | | I am not an antiabortion crusader. I'm offering what I understand to be the antiabortion position here. By ":(" I wanted to imply "Unfortunately there are seemingly lots of people who seem to hold this view genuinely and very strongly", which was not my greatest moment of clear communication. | |
| ▲ | MrDrMcCoy a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | Indeed. If bringing justice to the guilty requires punishing the innocent, what's even the point? |
|
|
|
| ▲ | datadrivenangel a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| this case was a self administrated abortion? |
| |
| ▲ | MrDrMcCoy a day ago | parent [-] | | The trail of injustice required to bring justice to such a case does not result in a balanced scale. |
|
