Remix.run Logo
lazzlazzlazz a day ago

It's incredible how much traction the completely fabricated anti-data center propaganda has gotten, given it is false in all dimensions (uses hardly any water, decreases local energy bills, don't make noise).

The interest groups opposing them will do anything, including harming economic growth, jobs, great products, and life-saving research — as long as it kneecaps their rivals.

jerrythegerbil a day ago | parent | next [-]

A datacenter was built a couple hundred feet from my apartment complex around 2013-2014. Absolutely none of your comment would have even remotely held true at the time, and my family moved away as a direct result.

Assuming positive intent, what’s different nowadays that makes it all different? It would actually make me pretty happy to hear about the incredible leaps and bounds that’ve been taken.

Sabinus a day ago | parent [-]

What did the nearby datacentre do that made you move?

nfRfqX5n a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

our energy bills went up 30% YOY and we are nowhere near a data center. It’s easy to see why people don’t like this

happyopossum a day ago | parent | next [-]

-> and we are nowhere near a data center.

Please square that with a rational argument against data centers then?

matteoraso a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Then it sounds like your energy bill wasn't because of a data centre.

jamesfinlayson a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> It's incredible how much traction the completely fabricated anti-data center propaganda has gotten

Agreed - here in Australia one of the big TV networks was heavily advertising a story last week about the big bad data centres coming to suburbia. You can be critical of Australia's local governments all you want, but at least in the big cities, no one is going without water or power for any appreciable amount of time due to data centres or anything else.

derwiki a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Who are the interest groups you’re referring to?

protocolture a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I have been sending more letters to the editor and politicians than ever before.

A senator down south has been repeating the noise concern trolling from the USA, but wont even go to his local DC <3 minutes from his office to have a listen. I saw someone defend the noise complaints by saying "Oh but we are getting one of those gas turbine ones" and when I looked at the project it was being built really far away from habitation to take advantage/mutually invest in Gas and Renewable power nearby. (The gas being used as a method to fill a pumped hydro project). Both power sources were approved before the DC.

You just cant win. The stupid is the product.

It really is just a case of opportunistic politicians feeding the mob.

m0llusk a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Similar to the trajectory of nuclear power which lost public approval for reasons that are not entirely rational.

onaclov2000 a day ago | parent [-]

I have been half wondering if it gets bad enough will people be willing to support nuclear power again.

SoftTalker a day ago | parent [-]

Gen Alpha or whatever the latest rising adults are called might. They are too young to remember any of the disasters

phil21 a day ago | parent [-]

All… three of them if you really try hard? Really only two qualify as disasters to me. Three Mile Island wasn’t great, but certainly not a disaster on any level I can figure.

SoftTalker a day ago | parent [-]

Yeah Chernobyl was the only really bad one. Windscale was bad also but that was a long time ago and not a power reactor. Neither reactor design is anything anyone would try to run today.

Edit: Well, RBMKs are still running in Russia but with significant safety upgrades.