| ▲ | kloop a day ago | |
Give how default gcc and clang are, along with the recommendation to update the standard instead of gcc and clang, it sounds like the standard is noncompliant with standard C++ Standard in the sense of commonly used or supplied | ||
| ▲ | dataflow a day ago | parent | next [-] | |
The blog post basically said exactly this: > IMO the blame here doesn't lie on gcc or clang; it lies on the standard. that is, the standard is wrong and should be updated to make this implementation-defined. | ||
| ▲ | ksec a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Yes. And Hasn't this always been the case? Before GCC and Clang took over everything there were plenty of C / C++ compilers from Intel, Visual C++ etc. | ||
| ▲ | pizlonator a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Yes The only truth is shipping code Specs are secondary | ||
| ▲ | pmkary a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |
I laughed so hard at this.... | ||