A CV on your personal domain is the most IndieWeb thing you can do, it means your professional identity lives under your control, not LinkedIn's. The "anarchy symbol on expensive clothes" critique works when someone claims to reject the system while feeding it. IndieWeb does not claim to reject professionalism, it claims that your content should belong to you and outlive any platform. The headshot, the CV, the polished blog... those are fine. Locking them inside a silo that can shut down, sell your data, or vanish is the thing being criticized.

▲

pibaker a day ago | parent [-]

When i think about being indie, I think about the era when personal websites were not meant to be money business and the common sense on the internet was to adopt a pseudonym and never tell anyone where you live.

Having a CV seems antithetical to the entire idea of indieness.

	▲	andros 20 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		IndieWeb wasn't born as an anti-capitalist movement, but rather at a time when protocols were more prevalent than content. If you review its core principles, everything revolves around creating, sharing, and persevering over time. Companies aren't the enemy.
	▲	alfirous 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		To me Indieweb just another name for personal website or personal blog. Since it's personal, I guess people can do anything to their website, including looking for job. > Having a CV seems antithetical to the entire idea of indieness. By that logic, Indie music artist can't sell their song.
	▲	axus a day ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I think you can be both indie and self-serving.