Is qwen 3.6 27b the best model you can run locally at the moment? Not that I have the VRAM for it, but just curious.

ch_sm a day ago | parent | next [-]

In my experience, yes. A bit more reliable than gemma for me. I mostly use A3B (35B, mix of experts) though, because it‘s faster, and in the same ballpark intelligence wise as the dense 27B, so it’s the sweetspot for me. I want to try cohere‘s mini code model next, but worried the runtimes aren‘t optimized for that yet.

▲

mark_l_watson a day ago | parent | next [-]

I found qwen3.6:26b slightly better on my 32G mac mini than the same sized gemma until gemma was updated with better tool support 4 or 5 days ago.

It is like a ping-pong game: the advantage flips back and forth between providers.

▲

regularfry a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Worth knowing that Unsloth have just put out another Gemma 4 release from Google's upstream updates which should improve reliability. Bugs in the chat template affecting tool calling and other issues, apparently. https://www.reddit.com/r/unsloth/s/MpC6Hzs4Wj

▲

dofm a day ago | parent [-]

Wow, thanks. I didn't see Unsloth had already done their version; I was just about to go back to the google version to test this change.

	▲	regularfry 10 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Yeah, it's only a chat template change. So if you don't fancy re-downloading the whole model and can just hack the new chat template into your process, it's a lightweight test to do.

▲

androiddrew a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I have been running 3.6 27b on a dual AMD r9700 setup using Opencode and Matt Pocock's skills workflow for writing Golang CLIs. It's decent, but won't win any awards on code architecture. I guess you can try to AGENTS.md the deficits but I am just exploring its raw Opencode experience right now. Much slower than an API but still 3x times faster than I can read. Tuning it in with a community chat template and a specific penalty for repeats was the sauce needed to get it to work. I can probably start loop daddying it now over the tickets Matt's flow creates.

So yeah, it's the best local model I've seen. I am going to try the Qwopus 3.6 fine tune soon with the same spec and tickets and compare the output of both.

	▲	SomeHacker44 a day ago \| parent [-]
		Would you mind sharing more please? I literally just finished the same set up, with a 9950X CPU and 192G RAM at 4,800 MT/s. I used lemonade with Vulkan and the UD-Q8_x_x model from HF. 256k context. I have about 8G VRAM free, and use the iGPU for my desktop/monitor on Arch. What options do you give llama-cpp or whatever you run please? What other models have you found fit nicely in the 2xR9700? Thanks!!

▲

seanmcdirmid a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I actually have long discussions with Gemini about this and have wound up download a bunch of different models for different things. There is no best, just fast but worse, slow but better, agentic or not, reasoning or not great at large contexts, better world knowledge, uncensored, etc…. It’s a bit daunting actually since there isn’t really a one size fits all model that you can just use for everything.

▲

ernsheong a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yes it's between this and Gemma 4 31B which is much slower, but looks like it won't ever get an upgrade. I have to conclude that the MoE variants are unreliable, and MTP sometimes just can't get tricky formatting right.

	▲	dofm a day ago \| parent \| next [-]
		The whole series had an upgrade a couple of days ago actually — they have addressed embedded tool calling (and hopefully the MTP formatting stuff though I gave up running the Gemma MTP because it's often slower than not-MTP) Not tried it yet but I've seen tests that suggest they've properly fixed the tool calling issues.
	▲	SwellJoe a day ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		I find the 4-bit QAT with MTP to be entirely usable speed on both my boxes (Strix Halo and a desktop with two V620 GPUs, which are slightly faster than the Strix Halo).
	▲	cmrdporcupine a day ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		For whatever reason prefill (on my DGX Spark) is faster with the Gemma models than Qwen 3.6 models of similar size. On vLLM anyways. Likely just deeply tuned code contributed to vLLM by Google? vLLM gives me ~7000+ tok/sec with Gemma 4's MoE model. Vs ~6000 tok/sec for Qwen 3.6 MoE.

▲

hnfong a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

People have been able to run DeepSeek v4 flash with a high spec Mac.

▲

schaefer a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I flip flop between qwen 3.6 27b and qwen 3.6 35b 4b active.

But there’s also the quantization of DeepSeek v4 flash called dwarfstar

▲

cmrdporcupine a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Gemma4 models are arguably better. Or at least about the same.

▲

atemerev a day ago | parent | prev [-]

The best model you can run locally is Kimi K3, as long as you have the hardware. If "what model I can still run on a something resembling something I can put on desktop without separate electricity and cooling water inputs", then it is probably GLM 5.2 (can be run on e.g. Nvidia DGX Station workstation). As long as you have about $100k-$150k.