| ▲ | WhereIsTheTruth a day ago | |
It doesn't matter if it's cheaper, specially if it consumes more resources to do the same task as the competition Besides, in a few days, they'll change their pricing, doubling it during their peak hours, so, realistically: - It will be 2x more expensive if you live in their time zone - It will be 1.5x more expensive if you live in a time zone that is adjacent to theirs - It will be the same price IF you use it while they sleep (during offpeak hours) It's still cheap, but the price/performance ratio is not that good DeepSeek V4 didn't produce the same impact as V3, and Huawei dropping the ball is making it worse They had promised massive price cuts for July, so now (Huawei chips), but they had to rush the cuts because lack of momumtum (they advertised them as promotion), and are now backtracking by introducing this peak hours pricing Trump decided to help them a little by allowing them to buy more NVIDIA chips, so what exactly is China's role in all of this? We are supposed to blindly pat them in the back while praising them, all while handing them over our data? I thought they were dangerous competition threatening our model of society | ||
| ▲ | XCSme a day ago | parent | next [-] | |
I was not referring to the input/output price, but the cost of doing a specific tasks, in practice it is ~10x cheaper than GLM-5.2 for example, to accomplish the same task (for the tasks it can do). I have been happily using DeepSeek V4 Flash for the last couple of months now. I tried GLM-5.2 for a while, but it was too slow and verbose compare to DeepSeek V4 Flash. If I have a basic skill I need to execute, DeepSeek V4 flash is still the best model for it. | ||
| ▲ | rikima_ a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |
While willingly handing your data to american labs. Surely sounds so based. | ||