| ▲ | wmf 17 hours ago |
| Every photo will be AI-enhanced and correctly labeled as such. Just like every Web site has a cookie warning. |
|
| ▲ | Gigachad 17 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Analysis on steam shows not all games have the AI tag, and games which do sell measurably worse. |
|
| ▲ | 10000truths 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If that ends up happening, then the next step would be for the platform to derank listings that contain AI-enhanced photos, to set the proper incentive. That would be up to the platform to enforce, though. |
| |
| ▲ | ElProlactin 16 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | What incentive does the platform have to do this? Ostensibly, the agents/landlords are the ones who pay, so you're asking the platform to bite the hands that feed it. | |
| ▲ | ryukoposting 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It's not "if." My mother-in-law is a realtor. She has a storage locker full of furniture for staging. I guarantee that the monthly cost of that locker, plus the cost of moving the furniture in and out of every property is an order of magnitude more expensive than whatever tool is doing the AI fake staging. The cost savings are too attractive. | | | |
| ▲ | lostmsu 16 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | If platform cared they would have fixed problems already. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | jdiff 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This site doesn't. Many don't. |
| |
| ▲ | Gigachad 15 hours ago | parent [-] | | The sites that do have cookie banners tend to be the unbearable websites with 500 adverts, a full screen modal asking to sign up to the newsletter and redirecting you 30 times because you scrolled and touched the wrong element. |
|
|
| ▲ | PeterHolzwarth 17 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| so therefore don't create laws or pass city ordinances? I don't understand your logic. |
| |
| ▲ | wmf 15 hours ago | parent [-] | | If you want a particular outcome, legislate that outcome. |
|
