Its definitely an attack. Thats established from anthropics perspective. No one has a right to use Anthropic’s services in ways that directly violate the ToS and user agreements.

> from anthropics perspective

I guess I can see that, if you mean the targeted effort of creating many accounts w/ the intent of doing it at scale. Sure, they may see that as an attack. But again, it's only an attack from their perspective if you agree that using generations to distill is "wrong". I just don't see it, in general. You can't both sell tokens and decide that distilling is somehow illegal. Something, something, cake and eat it.

There's a lot of people diligently shilling for Anthropic in this thread. That's established from my perspective.

> Its definitely an attack. Thats established from anthropics perspective.

How do things get "established" from someone's perspective, exactly?

By that logic it is established from my perspective that Anthropic has no right to train on anything I've written that is publicly available on the internet.

Of course, they don't care about my perspective, but then again I don't care about theirs.