| ▲ | SpicyLemonZest 6 hours ago | |||||||
Is it really the case that Nike is a wealth signalling brand? In the investigation I think you're referring to (https://www.fastcompany.com/90697259/nike-appears-to-be-shre...), I find Nike's side of the story much more plausible: if they find in processing returns that a shoe appears to have been altered, they prefer to reuse the shoe materials for other purposes, rather than carefully inspecting individual shoes to analyze what the alterations are and whether they might compromise the shoe's performance. | ||||||||
| ▲ | altairprime 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Regarding ‘wealth signaling’, a similar lens to mine would be ‘brand dilution’, which is certainly a more widely-accepted concept in business management; see also: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959809 The EU has disagreed with Nike, and the law is now in effect. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | ryandrake 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
It’s probably been 20 years since I’ve even noticed what brand of shoes anyone was wearing, let alone processed that information into some kind of economic class judgment. Is this really still a thing? | ||||||||
| ||||||||