"Human produces output similar to a machine trained on all human output"

It is funny (and perhaps a bit depressing) that LLMs were trained on our content and now, if we generate a similar structure as before, with the usual love and care, we will be criticized by it. Even when it does not "look bad or is a bad result".

	▲	chickensong 5 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		It is indeed funny/sad to see the rancor created by our own inputs. You can't escape the AI police on HN right now. There will always be someone leaving a shallow complaint or accusation about the look or language, regardless of reality. Obviously slop exists, but the culture war has polarized some people enough that they're blinded, and anything resembling LLM output is a trigger. God help you if you use useful language like "load-bearing", because the police are definitely on their way. FWIW, I don't think the site fits the LLM template. The scroll through the use cases is particularly nice. And thanks for Elixir. I love it, and the agent + tidewave loop is a joy to use!
	▲	lenkite 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Thankfully, the webpages I make are so god-awful that no one can accuse of me of using an LLM. I use bog-standard browser controls for forms - they look fugly but its so rare to see raw/naked form controls nowadays that they look snowflake special.