How does tangled compare with codeberg? Seem like a cool project, wonder how the migration story is.

I use both. Tangled is missing some important features (private repos, protected branches). The ui feels more comfy to me, though. And Codeberg is quite slow for me.

Idk if I can give you toooo much about migration, since I haven't used any CICD kind of stuff; just having repos to push to is super simple if you use their hosted knots. Also not too complicated to host a knot yourself; I'm hosting my own knot, and I like that I own at least one of the servers that I'm pushing code to.

▲

nicce 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Tangled is also VC funded, something to consider.

	▲	aruff an hour ago \| parent [-]
		It doesn't really matter, you can host your own knot (git backend), spindle (CI/CD worker), and there are already alternative apps to access the same public, consumable records without centralized infra: https://untangled.wisp.place/

▲

arikrahman 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I just switched to Tangled. It was actually very similar experience. I will be using Tangled henceforth!

▲

preisschild 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

What makes Tangled different from other forges like Forgejo/Codeberg is that its built around the ATProto federation protocol

	▲	opem 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Except it isn't just working as a federation protocol here, it is also acting as an identity provider and a data store for you social interaction on a repo.