| ▲ | skybrian 3 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This apparently required a 10-page prompt. It seems like someone needs to know enough to write it? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | dwohnitmok 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The author also used GPT-5.6 to write the prompt. This did involve giving GPT-5.6 access to his previous work and a back and forth process (so definitely still used the author's expertise to some degree), but the prompt itself is also largely AI generated. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ch4s3 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Certainly. This feels similar, to me, to how building complex software with LLMs works today in practice. You need to know a lot to set up goals and guardrails and verify outputs. For me, making the bits change was always the fun part, not tangling with text in my editor, though that had its moments. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | jvanderbot 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Yeah, back to the gold-in-gold out use of LLMs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||