| ▲ | khalic 5 hours ago |
| https://postimg.cc/n9nZGLmb Goodness of Fit 0.911, Kurtosis -0.849, Skewness: 0.073 It's very much a bell curve |
|
| ▲ | fluoridation 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Just because it's approximated by a bell curve doesn't make it a bell curve. There are quite obvious separate phenomena shaping the curve at different times. |
| |
| ▲ | khalic 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > just because it's approximated by a bell curve doesn't make it a bell curve I'm going to assume this is bait... | | |
| ▲ | jdlshore 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Bell curves are probability distributions. This is a time series, so it can’t be a bell curve. It just has the same shape. | | |
| ▲ | khalic 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Are you discarding the utility of Gaussian functions in analysis simply because the independent variable is time? A Gaussian curve can be used as a descriptive model without claiming that the observations themselves are a probability distribution The fit does not prove causation, but it does show that the decline was already well described by a trend that began years before generative AI. If the claim is that 2023 created a separate structural break, it's different claim then the title describes |
|
| |
| ▲ | strken 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Do you mean "just because it's a bell curve, doesn't make it a normal distribution"? | |
| ▲ | 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
| ▲ | 3uruiueijjj 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Those graphs look nothing alike, except for "going up and then vaguely going down." |
| |
