Counter example, the book that is the foundation of much coursework and learning for people in AI, has a whole section on "Machine Learning" with all that k-means and such in there - https://aima.cs.berkeley.edu/

▲

LoganDark 4 hours ago | parent [-]

I'm really not sure how that's a counterexample. The section is called machine learning, not AI. Machine learning is a useful tool for artificial intelligence, so I'd be surprised if a book about AI did not talk about it.

▲

awwaiid 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I'm saying that Machine Learning was borne of AI from the very beginning. ML has become specialized enough that we may later (much much later) declare it somehow larger/separate/overlapping, but it originated from AI as the generic umbrella.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_learning

▲

fragmede 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Machine learning is just what we call AI that works.

	▲	LoganDark 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Math is just what we call a video game that works. What?