| ▲ | forestry 5 hours ago | |||||||
[flagged] | ||||||||
| ▲ | pudgywalsh 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Security professionals - the progenitors of unrealistic expectations - also expect homeowners to buy $800 Axis cameras while they stroke their beards. When they get down to the $20 price point like the Chinese schlock, let me know, I'll be first in line to buy them. | ||||||||
| ▲ | wolvoleo 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
A random post on hacker news isn't going to make a dent in TP-Link's camera marketshare positive or negative. If the GP really has bad motives they wouldn't really accomplish anything with that. But I doubt they do. I use these cams myself too. They're ok if you limit their internet access. I limit all my TP-Link stuff anyway since they suddenly removed local access for their switched power plugs in an auto firmware update. It's not the best company but they're cheap. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | justsomehnguy 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
There is only two ways to receive this unencrypted data: - to do the song and dance to allow the whole Internet to access this cam - and 'security professionals' have been advising no to do that no matter what vendor it is - to sit on your wire, literally and sniff everything Unencrypted personal data is not good but if you have a habit of leaving your car with the open doors, windows and a key in the ignition - don't run around telling horror stories what someone didn't close the lid on a cookie jar. | ||||||||
| ||||||||