|
| ▲ | AdieuToLogic 2 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| Two quotes from the writ filed support my position. The court finds that the following domain name is
owned by Defendant ...
Defendant is not a resident of this state and is
a foreign corporation.
> You're going to have give us the "explicit" quotation ...The aforementioned does so. Until and unless you can show how the Defendant has an established presence within the State of Texas, such that its jurisdiction is applicable, it is difficult for me to consider your position considered and/or informed. |
|
| ▲ | lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| > You're going to have give us To be fair, only some of "us" are unwilling to read a two-page document to be informed about a topic under discussion. The words you're looking for are "Defendant is not a resident of this state and is a foreign corporation." |
| |
| ▲ | jasonfarnon 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Nice try, that's not the same as not doing business in the state. Most businesses are incorporated in Delaware, they get sued in every state of the union. | | |
| ▲ | AdieuToLogic 2 days ago | parent [-] | | > Nice try, that's not the same as not doing business in the state. Again, until and unless you can show how the Defendant has an established presence within the State of Texas, such that its jurisdiction is applicable, it is difficult to consider your position considered and/or informed. |
|
|
