| ▲ | blemasle a day ago | ||||||||||||||||
I didn't know the imperial system was named "standard". Funny, cause its everything but standard both internationally and its definitions (which are not standard as based on SI) | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | fc417fc802 a day ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Claiming something isn't standard because it isn't based on SI is entirely circular in the case of weights and measures. That said I wish the US would bite the bullet and make the switch. Mandating dual labeling on everything would be a great start. Then in 20 years we could narrow it back down to one. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Dan_- a day ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I know you’re being snarky, but the US system is not “imperial” anyway. It’s properly “US Customary” but is often called “US Standard.” | |||||||||||||||||