I think calculator is not part of the labels in cifar-10. Pretty normal as it has ‘only’ 90% accuracy. Things could improve quickly though

▲

jcs an hour ago | parent [-]

That 90% only measures images already known to be one of CIFAR-10’s ten classes. There is no “none of the above,” so even a perfect benchmark score would still force a calculator into one of those labels.

	▲	Eduard 31 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		yep: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIFAR-10 "The 10 different classes represent airplanes, cars, birds, cats, deer, dogs, frogs, horses, ships, and trucks."