| ▲ | j_maffe 4 hours ago |
| Yes and that would improve its ability to draw SVGs of pelicans on bikes, no? |
|
| ▲ | 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | barrenko 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Would it? Tongue in cheek. |
|
| ▲ | asasidh 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| and that is bad because ? |
| |
| ▲ | program_whiz 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | the nature of the test was to see if the models can effectively compose an image of a novel concept outside the training set. If they are trained on it, it ceases to be an interesting test to some extent. | | |
| ▲ | wasabi991011 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I would urge you to re-read the blog post you are commenting on. It pretty clearly explains how it is an interesting test independently of "see[ing] if the models can effectively compose an image of a novel concept outside the training set". | |
| ▲ | cyanydeez 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | it's still interesting because there's no pelican-on-bike model, and if you're training a model well enough, then it should be obvious when a model has reached "AGI" or whatever. |
|
|
