That's not enough though. He could have been acting rogue or for some other reason. That alone won't win in court

Danox a day ago | parent | next [-]

Among 40 ex Apple employees come on at least five or six of them probably crossed the line in their enthusiasm to get the big bucks.

If it was a small number, four or five total, maybe, but not 40.

	▲	JumpCrisscross a day ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Also, Apple confronted OpenAI about LOL Liu. OpenAI’s response wasn’t to fire him, conduct an investigation and confidentially settle with Apple. It was to go cold.
	▲	aprilthird2021 4 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		"come on" isn't any kind of proof

iAMkenough a day ago | parent | prev [-]

"acting rogue" but faced no action from OpenAI after this came to light

	▲	aprilthird2021 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Because it's part of an investigation. Again this isn't proof of anything. He may have not ever used this information at work yet and so this is an issue between him and his former employer