From their status page

>The second path involves rolling back a recent change to the billing computation subsystem.

Want to bet AI code was involved?

Cthulhu_ 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I'm not a betting person but I am looking forward to the postmortem, whether or not AI was involved, and what their code to production verification stuff looks like now. This kind of thing should have been caught by automated tests.

	▲	dvfjsdhgfv 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		There is an enormous amount of money invested in trying to prove the opposite, for this reason not only they will never admit it, they will actively negate AI was used. It happened before: https://www.theregister.com/software/2026/02/24/aws-would-ra...

▲

CarRamrod 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

>Spawning Sub-Agent: "Dr. Evil"

▲

Xunjin 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

User: "I want to improve the billing system to be more efficient and só we can earn more money"

AI: "No problem, let me change how we bill and fix the tests for the new increase in value"

▲

a012 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Is it still a bet if you have 99.999% chance to win?

▲

phyzome 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

They'll never admit it.

	▲	devin-2030 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Why would they? Changing colors on the status dashboard needs VP approval.

▲

verzali 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Can I bet you 437 billion dollars?