It was probably scored by AI too. Same reason why slop-filled resumes apparently work better these days.

gchamonlive a day ago | parent | next [-]

> Same reason why apparently slop-filled resumes work better these days.

It'll also filter the kinds of employers that'll hire such candidates, so people that do this will likely land in terrible workplaces.

dymk a day ago | parent [-]

It’s a nice thought, but it’s probably not true as the AI becomes integrated into standard hiring tools

inigyou 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Yep. Looking for a job right now. There are very few workplaces that don't do this.

	▲	gchamonlive 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Sorry to hear that

layer8 a day ago | parent | prev [-]

It’s true by virtue of any place relying on such tools having a high likelihood of turning into a horrible workplace due to the resulting hires.

	▲	dymk a day ago \| parent [-]
		They're standard because everybody uses them. There are no big hiring CMS offers which don't integrate AI. I'm not saying this is good, but I am saying that the companies hiring have less of a choice in all this than you'd hope.

AI reviews, AI approves, AI recruits

mapt a day ago | parent [-]

We need a sufficiently advanced world model to ground-truth our large language models.

EDIT: This was mostly satirical.

	▲	onesandofgrain a day ago \| parent [-]
		Yes, let's fund some more trillions for that instead of curing cancer or making extremely effective solar panels or curing alzheimer and artherosclerosis. We could have spent these 10 trillion on so many better things.