| ▲ | boca_honey 2 hours ago |
| I don't have a problem with AI and can't stand the anti-AI brigade, but... this is the worst thing I have ever seen in my life. This specific type of garbage is exactly what arms the anti-AI critics with valid arguments. We should really wait a few years for the technology to mature before releasing these kinds of projects into the cultural sphere. |
|
| ▲ | fallinditch a minute ago | parent | next [-] |
| My first thought was "we'll be seeing a lot more of this sort of thing, we're so fucked" but then found myself being quite amused by the AI-glitching mistakes in the GPT 5.6 $25 effort: lean into the strange glitching and I won't be too upset. |
|
| ▲ | 13 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | Lerc an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If you benchmark is to be better than a human familiar with the task at hand, then you will be disappointed. If you are not expecting them to be as good as people then their failures seem wholly unremarkable. The specific nature of tbe failures can be quite interesting in fact. They can expose deficiencies in the architecrure, training data, or presumptiona of those controlling the models. In my experience very few people are claiming the capabulities that would be required for me to expect them to produce better than they currenrly are. I'm not bothered by a fish's inability to quote Shakespeare. |
| |
| ▲ | runarberg an hour ago | parent [-] | | > I'm not bothered by a fish's inability to quote Shakespeare. But I am bothered when they put a pencil in the mouth of a fish and tell us that this is the future of literature, that this qualifies as playwright, and that theaters will soon begin putting on plays written by a fish with a pencil in its mouth. | | |
| ▲ | Lerc an hour ago | parent [-] | | But they are not claiming that current models are better than humans but later developments might. Do you think that a descendant of a fish could be a playwright or put on a play? | | |
| ▲ | TehCorwiz an hour ago | parent [-] | | Objectively no. Fish form animals have been around far longer than mammals and we've touched the moon. | | |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | d--b an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Not everything is a war between those in favor and those against… |
|
| ▲ | sneak 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The article is not about video quality. |
|
| ▲ | tonyhart7 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I don't think its that bad, you are just hater |
|
| ▲ | bjourne 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Eh, I'd like to see YOU make a better music video for $100 or less! |
| |
| ▲ | ArlenBales 26 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Been done many times before. E.g. https://youtu.be/lLYD_-A_X5E?is=DqNgAGlosIXO9z3V | |
| ▲ | runarberg 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This is such a bad argument: a) You are allowed to dislike cheap stuff, in fact it is common in western culture to dislike art where it is obvious that the artist cheaped out. b) Never in the history of western art critique has there been a requirement that the critic is able to do better then the artist (let alone for cheaper). As the saying goes, “I may not be able to pilot a 100000 ton cargo ship, but I can tell when one is stuck in a canal.” | |
| ▲ | slopinthebag an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | If you don’t count the cost of the phone I think many people could. See, it would look like it cost $100, but that’s still better than using AI to generate something that looks like the temu version of a $500,000 video. | |
| ▲ | byzantinegene 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | or i can just not do it? this absolute garbage of a music video is not worth a single cent, let alone a $100. | | |
| ▲ | stale2002 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | What do you mean, I thought it was fun. Feel free to not make your own music videos, but I am not sure why you would be so upset about other people having fun. | | |
| ▲ | scarecrowbob an hour ago | parent [-] | | People say this a lot, and I usually think it's said by folks who haven't thought about it much. As a person who makes a lot of music, I don't care if folks have fun. In fact I am having such a hard time caring hat folks do or how they do it I can't get motivated to book any shows this season. But the part you're missing is when folks make these things and then say "yeah, you see this thing we're doing? That's what we think -you- are doing." LIke when someone sets up an LLM to shit out some song lyrics, I don't care if they are having fun doing it, but I think it displays a lot of contempt for [insert an songwriting artist youlike here] to claim that the LLM is doing the same thing. Which is fine and all- I've got plenty of unmitigated contempt for my fellow humans. And you don't even need a computer to do that- I've released a certain amount of music that is facile and boring and in retrospect understand why folks were dismissive. But if you want to understand why folks who consider themselves invested in their craft (or even invested in other artists' craft) are dismissive of these things, then you might consider how radically dismissive of craft these kinds of cultural products might seem to artists. |
| |
| ▲ | bjourne an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | "or i can just not do it", because you can't! To much pride to admit that the bot beats your ass every day of the week ten times over when it comes to making music videos so the cop out is "nah, man, I just don't wanna." |
|
|
