| ▲ | Rury 19 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
There are more numerous cases where cities happen to be situated fairly close together in Europe, where trains actually are a more sensible travel option, hence the fixation there. Planes instead make more sense the further you must travel. I mean, depending on circumstances, it takes nearly the same amount of time to travel from Chicago to St. Louis by plane as it does by car. Something shorter than that and it can actually take longer to get there by plane than it does by car. I mean no one takes a plane to travel to a city that's only 30 minutes away by car - as it often takes longer to get through airport security and board a plane than that. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | neonstatic 12 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
3 years ago I was traveling from northern Poland to southern Poland by train - the only option unless you have a car. It so happened that my family was flying from Toronto to Warsaw at the exact same time. They arrived before I did and were much more comfortable than I was, too. Not to mention the safety aspect. Of course if we're talking about cities that are 20-30 minutes away by car, then flying would not be reasonable. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||