| ▲ | reilly3000 3 days ago | |||||||
I found some correctness issues that leave me a little unimpressed, although it’s a pretty phenomenal piece of code golf in general. For example, on my second move I mistakenly entered f1a1 instead of f1a6. It accepted this and then suddenly I had a bishop where the rook should be and no idea if my rook still exists. | ||||||||
| ▲ | wat10000 3 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||
It's intentionally rather limited. There's no validation of the input moves, and it leaves out some important rules. > Moves are trusted and given in plain coordinates: no click-to-move, no castling, en passant, or promotion. | ||||||||
| ||||||||