| ▲ | janalsncm 4 hours ago |
| I think they’re saying if AI text is causing people to buy (and presumably read) more, that’s a good thing. As in, if these marginal readers actually prefer AI texts, what does that say about human writing? |
|
| ▲ | superjan 4 hours ago | parent [-] |
| It tells you that human attention can be gamed. |
| |
| ▲ | janalsncm 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Sure, and I feel something for the authors who are in it to write a high-quality novel. For the authors who are in it for the game, writing bottom of the barrel airport checkout line garbage, they were already trying to game people’s attention and they lost to a robot. | | |
| ▲ | mcphage an hour ago | parent [-] | | The existence of someone buying AI slop and being okay with it isn't the same as losing to a robot. Unless you mean losing that specific sale, but they're not outselling human authors yet, and it's not clear they will until their quality improves immensely. | | |
| ▲ | janalsncm 40 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I do mean losing that specific sale. I’m also referring to the economists who saw an increase in sales. This means there are marginal readers who previously didn’t buy any book but now buy AI slop books, or buy slop books in addition to human ones. |
|
|
|
