It would be all fine and good if they kept it non-commercial, but when you start charging money for it that's when you're stepping out of bounds. If they want to benefit from fair use, they should contribute their results back to the public domain. Getting it for free and then commercializing it is what's unethical.

>Getting it for free and then commercializing it is what's unethical.

Like all those unethical software devs taking salaries for turning stackoverflow into products? I suppose the blood still flows since now they just use LLM output?

Any way you try and slice LLM morality, you end up with "It's bad because they are not me" reasons. "When I monetize information I get for free, it's good, when they monetize information they get for free, it's bad"