| ▲ | youre-wrong3 a day ago | |||||||
You seem to contradict yourself. You state “ignore these downsides” and “due to their own ignorance…” Then you say “it replaces human interactions” which it absolutely does not. It seems the pro ai and anti ai crowd seem to have this misconception that humans are removed from the equation when the reality is the position has shifted. | ||||||||
| ▲ | customguy a day ago | parent [-] | |||||||
> You state “ignore these downsides” and “due to their own ignorance…” What's the criticism? That you can't ignore something you're ignorant of? [0] or maybe you don't understand what that means in the first place, making it impossible for you to hand wave it away [1] I hate this style of discussion, "uhm akshually there's a piece of dust" that is just left hanging, as if that means the point is somehow diminished. And then there isn't even a piece of dust most of the time, or it's completely besides the point. > Then you say “it replaces human interactions” which it absolutely does not. It seems the pro ai and anti ai crowd seem to have this misconception that humans are removed from the equation If you replace one person giving another person an object with that person A leaving it at a dead drop and person B picking it up, you removed the interaction without removing the humans. > when the reality is the position has shifted. To where? You're just hand waving the removal of human interactions away [0], to say all that can be dismissed, instead it's something that means nothing at all. "we haven't disconnected people, we just put them behind bulletproof glass on separate continents, we just shifted their position" [1] See what I did there? I put the a footnote where it doesn't go, just as a little quirky thing, because why not. | ||||||||
| ||||||||