Postmodernism is a hell of a drug.

What discipline, outside academia, could position "nothing is neutral" as insightful and helpful commentary?

So is doing nothing, consuming resources and goods created by others, and living in the default state of humanity: brutality, poverty, and early death.

If it sounds if I'm being glib in this statement, I am. This article is an unreasonable amount of words which eventually boil down to "we have choices in what we do": an exactly equivalent statement to "X is just a tool, it depends on how we use it." Which, of course, is the thesis he intended to rail against.