| ▲ | pstuart an hour ago | |
You are probably correct, but I imagine the SQLite team's dedication to backwards compatibility has things the way they are so that existing systems can user later versions a swap without worrying about changing the SQL using it. | ||
| ▲ | usefulcat a minute ago | parent | next [-] | |
If they’re opt-in, how could the new defaults be a problem for backwards compatibility? | ||
| ▲ | justinsaccount 12 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |
The entire point of "SQLite should have editions" is so that projects can opt into a set of modern defaults for 2026 and not get all of those backwards compatible decisions from 20 years ago. | ||