| ▲ | moritzwarhier a day ago | |
It does sound and look like it (also the HN submission text...). I hope I'm not insulting s/1bpp/arbesman here as a person with genuine passion. But to me, the promises "LLMs can prototype your ideas quickly", "LLMs can build from solely a natural language description" increasingly sound like proverbial monkeys-paw-wishes. Not wrong, but also the opposite of helpful. I want to be clear here, I'm not talking about coding AIs/LLMs in general, just the particular flow simple idea -> working app All the great apps I've ever used, from the measliest web clients (think of some important form CRUD thing), to the most complex desktop applications (IDEs, DAWs, games): the moat was and is always attention to detail, and being a good "host" and guide for your users. This app is so blown up with bombastic text that the opposite applies, I first have to consider what mindset is required to find it interesting. Seems common. | ||