| ▲ | rajangdavis 2 days ago | |
I have a hypothesis that the bubble in and of itself would not be so problematic if the United States was not in a war with Iran. I am looking to test if there are several second order effects of rising oil prices and supply chain issues that can exacerbate financial contagion from an AI bubble (assuming we are in one) and, to the best of my understanding, it depends on what kind of mechanisms fail to contain the fall out. I don't think it is reasonable to assume doom, but I would imagine there needs to be considerations from a much broader perspective as to discuss the possibility of 'a larger capital stock, higher wages, and a lower interest rate' that is paper is asserting. I could be wrong (I am still trying to assess my hypothesis), but I am skeptical that the increased value/productivity from AI can overcome a rising cost of living if the war is sustained. | ||
| ▲ | AnimalMuppet 2 days ago | parent [-] | |
When a bubble pops, there's always a cause. But it's a messy, chaotic world out there. If it wasn't that cause, then it would be a different one. | ||