| ▲ | aforwardslash 20 hours ago | |||||||||||||
Im developing something vaguely in the same space (tamper proof audit log) - (or several things since I also have a custom temporal object mapper for postgres); what is the advantage of this project? It doesnt seem sql-compliant (afaik bitemporal operations are part of the SQL-2011 standard), and what this could add -tamper detection - seems absent. Not criticizing, just trying to understand the use case. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | lichtenberger 15 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||
It's first and foremost a document store / so for JSON or XML currently, that's why it's not SQL compliant. I think other query languages as JSONiq are much more tailored to this, albeit a niche of course (based on XQuery). Regarding tamper proof audit logs not much is missing. Cryptographic hashes instead of XXH3, a commit hash chain and signed commits. Actually, I think that's a great addition with minimal changes needed. What you can audit currently is "who changed what" for instance. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||