| |
| ▲ | RIMR an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | A $2,500,000,000,000.00 startup. An underdog really. | |
| ▲ | andsoitis 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Relative to OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google in the AI space? Absolutely. | | |
| ▲ | verandaguy 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Nah. They're all rotten to the core, just in different ways. The key difference between xAI and Anthropic/OAI/Google is that xAI has the least-likely path to existing as viable business in a decade. That said, the economics of the entire AI industry are kinda made up at this point, so who really knows; it's quite possible that the players with the best odds of surviving the crash are those that can draw funding from their parent company's other businesses. | | |
| ▲ | anonym29 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | >The key difference between xAI and Anthropic/OAI/Google is that xAI has the least-likely path to existing as viable business in a decade. I don't know, renting out a fleet of GPUs at annualized rate of ~100% of the capex deployed to obtain said GPUs seems reasonably better than lighting hundreds of billions of dollars on fire in order to earn tens of billions of dollars. | | |
| |
| ▲ | LastTrain 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | David was a good vs evil with an order of magnitude fewer resources on the good side. XAi is evil vs evil with comparable resources on each side. Now this is where I know you’re MAGA because as I’ve said a million times you guys don’t do fair comparisons. |
|
|
