Then why are they publishing the benchmarks which makes them look worse than GLM 5.2?

Because it's still informative

I'm not sure why I'm being downvoted but I didn't mean it in a negative way.

For such announcement, I would expect them to give me clues on when I should use this model and in which cases it's the best one.

The benchmarks that they share doesn't indicate that it's cheaper to run than other models, or can fit in my local machine, or excels in a specific vertical.

After reading the comments here and X, I can see it being the top-3 multi-modal open-source model though.

being close is still impressive, especially for their first (released) model

gives me hope that the training moat is even smaller than we thought