| ▲ | alexpotato 5 hours ago | |||||||
100% agree that the more deterministic code the better up to the limit where you need the LLM's ability to be non-deterministic to kick in. There is this ACM blog post called "Manual Work is a Bug" [0] that was originally written to help humans automate processes using code. I find it just as applicable today as when it was written. You and the LLM look at what has to be done and then figure out the scripts/tools to make it happen. You then tie those tools into a system. The more I use the above the more it makes sense and the worse the whole "just commit the prompt" seems like nonsense. | ||||||||
| ▲ | brainless 4 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
This is an interesting share, thanks. Yes, that is my mental model. Use coding agents to generate more "programs" (scripts) to automate everything. Have edge case handlers - and these handlers can develop/update the original scripts. | ||||||||
| ||||||||