| ▲ | skinfaxi 13 hours ago | |||||||
How does your solution differ from OPs? edit: To me it looks like yours has the following negative qualities: - closed source - requires signup for some service - says code doesnt leave my machine but this connects to your servers - requires Goose AI as a dependency | ||||||||
| ▲ | trjordan 13 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
So, we tried feeding the logs back to the LLM, and it mostly produced slop. Lots of decisions nobody cared about. The biggest things that moved the needle were: - Baseline it. We mine previous logs, github comments, etc. for "what you care about." That helps pull out decisions that you actually care to read. - Anchor to code. "The code enshrines this decision" is more interesting than "the agent self-talked this." Agents don't always self-talk decisions, and the thing that ultimately matters is the behavior in code. to your edit (and all totally fair): - Yes, closed source and signup required. A lot of what we're driving towards is easy team sharing, so we're taking the bath early instead of building an OSS thing and rug-pulling later. - Code doesn't leave your machine. There's an agent that runs locally. I know "trust me" isn't the strongest stance, but this comes from the multi-player future. - Honestly, Goose AI is a remnant of a previous product. It's inert and we'll clean it up once we've gotten the last couple folks off the previous iteration. | ||||||||
| ||||||||